Sunday, February 1, 2015

Second Anniversary

This blog is two years old this week. I’ve written more than 100 posts. 

There are more than 300,000 plants, each with a story. There are even more places to visit.  I am not going to run out of material. 

Researching and writing are great fun!

rose, Rosa sp.

What is often a challenge is having the right picture. If I didn’t take a photo of sunflowers during the summer, I don’t have it in the winter. Occasionally I use pictures taken by a friend but mostly this is a personal blog and if I don’t have pictures I postpone the topic.

Being an amateur photographer not all my photos work out. I have a theory that there are “photogenic plants”—beautiful and recognizeable from any angle--in a continuum down to very unphotogenic plants--where it is hard to get a decent photo.

Sloppy photos of roses come out nicely anyway.

Often an unphotogenic plant has a shape that makes it hard to get both leaves and flower in focus, for example the chicory (Chicorium intybus) and sunbright (Phermeranthus parviflorus) below. 

chicory, Cichorium intybus

On sunbright, there are long thin stems, two to three times longer than the leaves, that hold small flowers up above the plant--you can see brown stems reaching out of the picture and flopping on the rock. A lot of pictures fail, if I take enough one will succeed. 

sunbright, Phermeranthus parviflorus
sunbright, Phermeranthus parviflorus
Photographs have not always been digital or visible while standing by the plant. I still regularly celebrate digital photos! In the Old Days, using film in my camera, I had only so many pictures (36, maybe 72 with a backup roll) and each photo cost more than a dollar between purchasing film and getting it developed, so taking a dozen pictures of the same flower was not an option for me. Furthermore, I didn't get to see the pictures until they were developed, a week or more later.  Digital photos are wonderful!

But how can a botanist complain? Compared to animals that run or hide from me, plants are easy to photograph. Below, there were two big cerambicid (long-horned) beetles like the one in shadow on the left when I started to focus the old camera, but one dodged behind the leaf (arrow).)

Ipomoea carnea Costa Rica
two longhorned beetles on the morning glory Ipomoea carnea
Costa Rica

One of the joys of this blog is using my photos. A few years ago I started scanning old plant pictures (like the chicory above) into my computer. I wondered why I was bothering. I was retired and had no use for diverse and esoteric plant pictures. That has turned around radically in the last two years. Now I search through the photo files and wish for more choices. And I am actively photographing all sorts of things I had been walking by:  plants in the cracks in the pavement, house plants, pine cones. Sometimes I know how I'll use the image, sometimes I'm just building my photo-library.

Looking at the pictures included in this post, I am reminded that all plant photography is strongly seasonal. Of the photos I included, none can be taken in Colorado in January, tho in western Costa Rica that morning glory is blooming. New leaves or flowers or fruit, or leafless trees for that matter, happen in a particular time of year. It can be 11 months before the same picture can be taken again. I don't object to that--it is an essential part of botany--but it certainly affects my posts.

I have a prairie ecologist's maxim that goes: "Do it now, the weather may be worse later." 

There's a corollary that goes something like: "Notice the plants now, the season is changing."

Thank you for reading this blog: I'm looking forward to Year Three.

If you have questions, I’m happy to try to figure out the answers.

Comments and corrections welcome.

Kathy Keeler

No comments:

Post a Comment